No. 25114-CA
Precedential
Processed
Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 2d Cir., October 5, 1994 643 So. 2d 173; La. Ct. App. 2d Cir., August 23, 1995 661 So. 2d 503
Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 661 So. 2d 503 (La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995).
Cited by
- Guerrero v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 165 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
- Kristy Bailey v. David R. Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- Bailey v. Leblanc 151 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- Grinnell v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 156 So. 3d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
- Davis v. Foremost Dairies 58 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- Lewis v. State Farm Ins. Co. 946 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- Linnear v. Centerpoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy 945 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- Etheredge v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. 814 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- Labat v. Mallard Bay Drilling Co. 806 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Brandao v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 803 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- Kose v. Cablevision of Shreveport 755 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- Oubre v. Union Carbide Corp. 747 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Opinion text
[iSEXTON, Judge, dissenting. I consider these damages to be excessive by at least a multiplier of three. In fact, I believe they are so excessive as to amount to a windfall, rather than appropriate compensation.