Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lagarde v. Dabon, 98 So. 744.
- TIG Insurance Co. v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. 22 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Clementine Fairrow v. James E. Marves
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
685, 690, (1947) (holding that “concubines, although under certain disabilities, in the interest of good morals, are not prevented from asserting claims arising out of business transactions between themselves, independent of the concubinage”); 98 So.
- Broadway v. Broadway 417 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Julien v. Wayne 415 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- STATE ETC. v. City of Pineville 403 So. 2d 49 La. 1981
- Guerin v. Bonaventure 212 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Munson v. Martin 192 So. 2d 126 La. 1966
- Foshee v. Simkin 174 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
-
Shalett v. Brownell-Kidd Company
153 So. 2d 425
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
In addition to those cases, , 98 So.
- West v. Carbone 150 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
-
Chambers v. Crawford
150 So. 2d 61
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
Lagarde v. Dabon, et al., , 98 So.
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. 125 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
- Sparrow v. Sparrow 93 So. 2d 232 La. 1957
- Succession of Scott 58 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
- Gadlin v. Deggs 23 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
- Loraine Transfer Co. v. Daniel 11 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Jelsch v. Laurich 187 So. 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
-
Gray v. Carter
176 So. 885
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
It is well settled (see article 2834, R.C.C., , 98 So.
- Purvis v. Purvis 162 So. 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Moore v. Oliphint 137 So. 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
- Succession of Savant 132 So. 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
- Succession of Arnold 129 So. 150 La. 1930
-
Madison Lumber Co. v. Picheloup
125 So. 175
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
26 , , the court said: “And even ‘particular’ partnerships (which are such as are formed for any business not of a commercial nature) must be reduced to writing and recorded if they are to include real estate.
- Prieto v. Succession of Prieto 115 So. 911 La. 1928
-
Weiss v. Dabon
115 So. 139
La. 1927
The case was then remanded in order that she might have an opportunity of establishing her said claim for reimbursement ; the plea of prescription interposed thereto being referred to the merits, , 98 So.
-
Succession of Mereno
108 So. 133
La. 1926
We may add that, in holding that prescription does not begin to run against an indebtedness for money lent until the maturity of the indebtedness, we do not, in our view, , 155 La.