Adolph v. Sewerage & Water Board Pension Committee
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., January 16, 1969 218 So. 2d 106
Adolph v. Sewerage & Water Board Pension Committee, 202 So. 2d 664 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967).
Cited by
- New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New Orleans 242 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Daren Coutee v. the Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Coutee v. Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System 921 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- Smith v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 603 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Stanford v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 425 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- La. State Troopers Ass'n v. La. State Police, Etc. 417 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Patterson v. City of Baton Rouge 309 So. 2d 306 La. 1975
- Menville v. Stephens Chevrolet, Inc. 282 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Braswell v. Morris 275 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
- Adolph v. Sewerage & Water Board Pension Committee 204 So. 2d 576 La. 1967
Opinion text
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. In their application for a rehearing plaintiffs Harvey and Adolph contend they did not “freely choose” not to retire before the 1957 coordinated plan went into effect. We find our opinion could give that impression and the record does not support such a finding. However, the matter is immaterial. These two plaintiffs knew, or should have known, of the proposed social security payment deductions under the new plan and, according to their own testimony, they also knew they could have retired prior to the time the new plan went into effect. The application for a rehearing is refused. Rehearing refused.