Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jaubert Bros. v. Landry, 15 So. 2d 158.
- Gauthier v. Losavio 416 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Losavio v. Gauthier
412 So. 2d 1306
La. 1982
1st Cir. 1972); (La.App.
- Credit Service Corp. v. Bagley 364 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
-
Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc. v. Burdette
309 So. 2d 655
La. 1975
207 (1920); Jaubert Brothers, Inc. v. Landry, La.App., (1943); Marks v. Demarest, La.App., (1965); cert.
-
Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. Burdette
295 So. 2d 854
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
207 ; Jaubert Brothers, Inc. v. Landry, La.App., ; Schenker v. Demarest, La.App., ; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Ballard, La.App., .
-
Kayda v. Johnson
262 So. 2d 171
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
The law was basically enunciated in the case of Jaubert Bros.
-
Kayda v. Johnson
252 So. 2d 708
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Jaubert Bros., (1st La.App., 1943); (4th La.App., 1965).
-
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Ballard
250 So. 2d 217
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
2nd Cir. 1944); Jaubert Brothers, (La.App.
-
Corcoran v. Andrews
195 So. 2d 767
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Jaubert Brothers v. Landry, La.App., (1st Cir. 1943); Excel Finance Camp, Inc. v. Tannerhill, La.
- Bahan v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. 191 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
-
Credit Service Corp. v. Brewer
187 So. 2d 199
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
1 Cir., 1943) ; Henry v. Roque (La.App., 2 Cir., 1944) .
-
Marks v. Demarest
174 So. 2d 160
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
udgment be revived, the creditor should thereafter seek to subject any property not affected by the lien or judgment, or not in the hands of the court, or not otherwise subject thereto, to the payment of the judgment, then the bankrupt would have such right as his discharge under the bankrupt law gives, and he could invoke the discharge as a bar to such attempt’ ” *164 (La.App.lst Cír.
- Huff v. Justice 174 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
-
Distinguished
Louisiana MacHinery Company v. Passman
158 So. 2d 419
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
In support of his position, he cites Jaubert Bros. v. Landry, (La.App., 1 Cir., 1943), .
-
Wilson v. King
79 So. 2d 877
La. 1955
Jaubert Bros. v. Landry, La.App., ; Blanchard v. Smith, La.App., ; Scherrer v. Caneza, 33 La.Ann.
-
Blanchard v. Smith
45 So. 2d 527
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
314 ; Jaubert Bros., Inc., v. Landry La.App., .
-
Henry v. Roque
18 So. 2d 917
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
In a second supplemental brief he also cites, and seeks to distinguish, the case Jaubert Bros. v. Landry, La.App., , [161].