Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jaubert Bros. v. Landry, 15 So. 2d 158.

17 citing documents.

  • Gauthier v. Losavio 416 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Losavio v. Gauthier 412 So. 2d 1306 La. 1982
    1st Cir. 1972); (La.App.
  • Credit Service Corp. v. Bagley 364 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc. v. Burdette 309 So. 2d 655 La. 1975
    207 (1920); Jaubert Brothers, Inc. v. Landry, La.App., (1943); Marks v. Demarest, La.App., (1965); cert.
  • Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. Burdette 295 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    207 ; Jaubert Brothers, Inc. v. Landry, La.App., ; Schenker v. Demarest, La.App., ; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Ballard, La.App., .
  • Kayda v. Johnson 262 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    The law was basically enunciated in the case of Jaubert Bros.
  • Kayda v. Johnson 252 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Jaubert Bros., (1st La.App., 1943); (4th La.App., 1965).
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Ballard 250 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    2nd Cir. 1944); Jaubert Brothers, (La.App.
  • Corcoran v. Andrews 195 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Jaubert Brothers v. Landry, La.App., (1st Cir. 1943); Excel Finance Camp, Inc. v. Tannerhill, La.
  • Bahan v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. 191 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
  • Credit Service Corp. v. Brewer 187 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    1 Cir., 1943) ; Henry v. Roque (La.App., 2 Cir., 1944) .
  • Marks v. Demarest 174 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    udgment be revived, the creditor should thereafter seek to subject any property not affected by the lien or judgment, or not in the hands of the court, or not otherwise subject thereto, to the payment of the judgment, then the bankrupt would have such right as his discharge under the bankrupt law gives, and he could invoke the discharge as a bar to such attempt’ ” *164 (La.App.lst Cír.
  • Huff v. Justice 174 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Distinguished Louisiana MacHinery Company v. Passman 158 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    In support of his position, he cites Jaubert Bros. v. Landry, (La.App., 1 Cir., 1943), .
  • Wilson v. King 79 So. 2d 877 La. 1955
    Jaubert Bros. v. Landry, La.App., ; Blanchard v. Smith, La.App., ; Scherrer v. Caneza, 33 La.Ann.
  • Blanchard v. Smith 45 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    314 ; Jaubert Bros., Inc., v. Landry La.App., .
  • Henry v. Roque 18 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    In a second supplemental brief he also cites, and seeks to distinguish, the case Jaubert Bros. v. Landry, La.App., , [161].