Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rini, 95 So. 400.

17 citing documents.

  • State v. Lejeune 181 So. 2d 392 La. 1965
    Crim.Law § 196, p. 521, “Newspaper articles and other media of publicity with reference to the crime, even when denunciatory of accused, are not in themselves sufficient to show prejudice, unless they so arouse public hostility as to preclude a fair trial.” See, also, , 95 So.
  • State v. Hayden 147 So. 2d 392 La. 1962
  • State v. Rideau 137 So. 2d 283 La. 1962
  • State v. Rogers 132 So. 2d 819 La. 1961
    onable certainty from the body of such citizens, with the use of the safeguards of the law, a jury whose members will be able to try the case upon the law and evidence adduced on the trial, uninfluenced by what they may have heard of the matter, and who will give the accused the full benefit of any reasonable doubt which may arise from either the evidence or the lack of it?” , 95 So.
  • State v. Wilson 127 So. 2d 158 La. 1961
  • State v. Scott 110 So. 2d 530 La. 1959
  • State v. Faciane 99 So. 2d 333 La. 1957
    68, Section 68, verbo “Venue;” , 95 So.
  • State v. Doucet 5 So. 2d 894 La. 1942
  • State v. Scruggs 116 So. 206 La. 1928
  • State v. Joiner 112 So. 503 La. 1927
    77 , , and State v. Williams, 49 La.
  • State v. Genna 112 So. 655 La. 1927
    ed an opinion, from newspaper accounts of the crime, so fixed that it would require strong evidence to remove it, yet if taken on the jury would put aside their opinion, presume the defendants innocent, be governed entirely by the evidence, and would not convict the defendants without proof of guilt heyond a reasonable doubt, were competent and could not be challenged for cause; , 95 So.
  • State v. Brasseaux 112 So. 650 La. 1927
    In each of the above cases, defendant challenged the juror for cause and “for the reason that he had a fixed opinion, which he had admitted would influence him to some extent in weighing the evidence in the cáse or in arriving at his verdict.” , 95 So.
  • State v. Phillips 106 So. 375 La. 1925
  • State v. Roberson 105 So. 621 La. 1925
  • State v. Hamilton 99 So. 874 La. 1924
  • State v. Crispino 98 So. 623 La. 1923
  • State v. Holbrook 97 So. 27 La. 1923
    In State v. Rini , 95 South.