Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Webster v. New York Life Ins. Co., 107 So. 599.

22 citing documents.

Zanca v. Life Insurance Co. of North America 770 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Dunaway v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. 393 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Green v. Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. 390 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Rome v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tenn. 336 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Couto v. Oms 319 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
est but the weakest kind of evidence * * * and, "by the weight of authority, however, while such verdict is competent to be received in evidence as part of the proof that the death occurred, it is not even prima facie competent as tending to prove the cause of such death; and this is true when it is introduced by either party."` , 107 So.
Chambers v. FIRST NATIONAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW ORLEANS 253 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Briley v. Union National Life Insurance 246 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
*272 2d Cir. 1963) and the cases cited therein— , 107 So.
Hull v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 236 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Young v. First National Life Insurance Company 159 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
Franklin v. Old Colony Insurance Company 150 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
Lee v. Aetna Life Insurance 147 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Brooks v. Washington National Life Insurance 79 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Oubre v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York 21 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Heiman v. Pan American Life Ins. Co. 165 So. 195 La. 1935
Co., , at page 877, 107 So.
Newdigate v. Acacia Mut. Life Ass'n. 158 So. 358 La. 1934
854, ; Eckendorff v. Mutual Life Ins.
Ardoin v. Fireside Mut. Aid Ass'n 156 So. 363 La. 1934
Andrews v. Provident Life Accident Ins. Co. 153 So. 26 La. 1934
Johnson v. Sundbery 150 So. 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
t the weakest *303 kind of evidence * * * and, ‘by tbe weight of authority, however, while such verdict is competent to be received in evidence as part of the proof that the death occurred, it is not even prima facie competent as tending to prove the cause of such death; and this is true when it is introduced by either party.’ ” , 107 So.
Bayles v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. 148 So. 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Pecoraro v. New York Life Ins. 141 So. 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
emple, .where the defense was su'eide), the Supreme Court said: “When, in order to avoid liability on a policy issued by it, an insurance company relies on the defense that the insured ebmmitted suicide, the burden rests on the company to establish that the insured did commit suicide to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis.” , page 864, 107 So.
Michel v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America 110 So. 186 La. 1926
Faulk v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. 107 So. 395 La. 1926
*Page 539 In the case of Webster v. New York Life Insurance Co. (No. 25597) , post, p. 854, it was said, in speaking of the verdict of a coroner's jury, that: "The formal report of a coroner's jury is at best but the weakest kind of evidence.