DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co., 15 So. 2d 115.

20 citing documents.

  • Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete Co. 132 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Co., La.App., , writs denied) ; or in a higher position in another shop, (McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co., La.App., , writs refused) ; or has obtained a job in a clerical capacity at higher wages (Lala v. American Sugar Refining Co., La.App., , writs *520 denied); is of no moment and a common laborer, totally and permanently disabled, earning a higher wage performing different work will not be deprived of his right to
  • Zito v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. 76 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    This question was presented to this court in the case of McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co., La.App., , and we held: "* * * We are of the opinion, as pointed out in the case of Thompson v. Leach & McClain et al., supra, that there is a difference in the matter of allowing wages to take the place of compensation depending on whether the injured employee continued to work for the same employer he was working fo
  • Myers v. Jahncke Service 76 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    held that where an injury sustained by an automobile repair shop employee totally disabled him from doing manual work, the fact that he later obtained a position as superintendent in another shop did not deprive him of his right to compensation as he could no longer return to the occupation for which he was fitted b
  • Soudelier v. Travelers Ins. Co. 72 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co., La.App., , and cases there cited.
  • Nubles v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. 72 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    1943, ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co., La.App.1945, 21 So.
  • Loflin v. Erectors & Riggers, Inc. 68 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Corp., Ltd., La.App., ; McKinzie v. Standard Motor Car Co., La.App., ; Strother v. Standard Accident Ins.
  • Reeve v. Clement-Braswell MacHine & Fab. Works 66 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    See McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Company, La.App.1943, ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Company, La.App.
  • Strother v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. 63 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Corp., Ltd., La.App., ; McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co., La.App., .
  • Saltzman v. Lone Star Cement Corp. 55 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    some of its members; and, as in this case, where it appears that by performing the sort of labor plaintiff was performing as an avocation when injured, the pain and discomfort is increasingly aggravated, it would be a traverse of the humane spirit of that law to say that he is not entitled to the maximum of compensation provided by it.” Plaintiff cites McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co., La.App., , in which the employee was held to be totally and permanently disabled.
  • Weber v. Kieckhefer Container Co. 45 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    783 ; Sumrall v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., La.App., ; McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co. et al., La.App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., .
  • Boling v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation 42 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • Gilmore v. George W. Garig Transfer 33 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
  • Anderson v. H. H. Machine Shop 32 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars Co., 189 La.
  • Boulanger v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 31 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.
  • De Kerlegand v. Car General Ins. Corporation 30 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.
  • Jacobson v. Maryland Casualty Co. 30 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars Co., 189 La.
  • Gautreau v. Maryland Casualty Co. 28 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., , and which elaborated a bit on the opinion on this point in the case of Thompson v. Leach McClain, La.
  • Robinson v. Frost Hardwood Floors 25 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Brown v. Continental Oil Co. 22 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    App., and Thompson v. Leach McLain, La.
  • Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc. 23 So. 2d 45 La. 1945
    783 ; Sumrall v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., La.App., ; Phillips v. Wohlfeld, La.App., ; Thompson v. Leach & McClain, ; McKenzie v. Standard Motor Co., La.App., .