No. 25686
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
State v. Smith
State v. Smith, 95 So. 705 (La. 1923).
Cited by
- State v. Russell 108 So. 324 La. 1926
Opinion text
ST. PAUL, J. The accused was charged and convicted of having whisky in his possession for sale for beverage purposes. The record contains no bill of exception, or plea whatever presenting any question of law, and the appeal was frankly taken to have this court “review the evidence” on which the defendant was convicted. As this court cannot “review the evidence,” and defendant alleges no error of law, the judgment appealed from must stand. Decree. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.