Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bonvillain v. Richaud, 96 So. 21.

15 citing documents.

Securities Mortg. Co., Inc. v. Triplett 374 So. 2d 1226 La. 1979
Hebert v. Knoll 370 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Guidry v. Cheramie 345 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Catlett v. Catlett 99 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
760 , from which is quoted from the syllabus: "Heirs have no standing to sue for the recovery of property inherited by them until they shall have been recognized by a judgment, obtained contradictorily with the inheritance tax collector, putting them in possession and fixing the inheritance tax.” , 96 So.
Board of Commissioners, Etc. v. Sperling 12 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Montz v. Montz 2 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1941
But the suits which an heir may file before he is sent into possession are those which are necessary to conserve the property, or to preserve it from loss, such as tax redemption suits ( , 96 So.
Crawford, Jenkins & Booth, Inc. v. Wills 179 So. 455 La. 1938
293 ; , at page 435, 96 So.
Overruled Long v. Chailan 175 So. 42 La. 1937
Govan v. Parsons 155 So. 241 La. 1934
Prieto v. Faure 124 So. 150 La. 1929
Waecheter v. Seghers 8 La. App. 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
667 ; Bonvillian vs. Richaud, , 96 So.
Kivlen v. Horvath 113 So. 140 La. 1927
431 , , cited by defendant to show that it is not sufficient for one, who has purchased from the one who was owner at the time the property was offered at tax sale, to take and maintain actual possession of the property before the prescription of three years has accrued, to render the prescription inapplicable, do not suppo
Wilkerson v. Wyche 104 So. 381 La. 1925
Green v. W. G. Ragley Lumber Co. 98 So. 544 La. 1923
Barbarich v. Meyer 97 So. 459 La. 1923