Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Soniat v. White, 96 So. 19.

28 citing documents.

Travis Lee Stevens v. Darren Keith Bruce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Stevens v. Bruce 878 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Powell v. Dorris 814 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Moore v. Cameron Parish School Bd. 511 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN. 486 So. 2d 95 La. 1986
Soniat v. White, 153 La.424, ; Schmidt v. Conservative Homestead Association, 181 La.369, 159 So.
Marchand v. Armstrong 354 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Parks v. Winnfield Life Insurance Company 336 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Hargroder v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. 290 So. 2d 874 La. 1974
Rozas v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury 215 So. 2d 646 La. 1968
Nevertheless, although it does not appear from the reasons assigned for denying plaintiff’s application, , 96 So.
Rozas v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury 214 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
223 (on appeal); id., , 96 So.
Barr v. Freeman 175 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Georgia Pacific Corp. v. B.G.M. Builders 154 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Clark v. Town of Mandeville 105 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Maggio v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 102 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
223 (on appeal); Id., , 96 So.
Richard v. National Surety Corporation 99 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Wischer v. Madison Realty Company 92 So. 2d 589 La. 1956
Leteff v. Maryland Casualty Co. 82 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Saint Denis Securities Co. 72 So. 2d 257 La. 1954
City of Gretna v. Mitchell 64 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Bartholomew v. Impastato 12 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Hand v. Coker 11 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
On the other hand, testimony may be heard preliminarily to a trial of the merits (Soniat et al. v. White, Tax Collector et al., , 96 So.
McCain v. Le Blanc Bros. 10 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1942
In the case of Soniat et al. v. White, Tax Collector et al., , 96 So.
Peavy Wilson Lumber Co. v. Cotton 188 So. 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
587 ; Soniat v. White, Tax Col., , 96 So.
Alsaya v. Johnson 178 So. 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
652, 654 , we said: “It has also been held * * * that evidence destructive of plaintiff’s right may be received on trial of an exception of no right of action.” See, also, Soniat et al. v. White, Tax Collector, et al., , 96 So.
Duplain v. Wiltz 174 So. 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
We perceive that, in Schmidt v. Conservative Homestead Ass’n, supra, the Supreme Court has thus decided in differentiating that case from the case of Soniat et al. v. White, Tax Collector, et al., , 96 So.
State Ex Rel. Hills, Inc. v. Recorder of Mortgages 173 So. 139 La. 1937
Schmidt v. Conservative Homestead Ass'n. 159 So. 587 La. 1935
In support of the argument that evidence is admissible on the trial of an exception of no cause of action, the attorneys for the appellee cite Soniat et al. v. White, Tax Collector et al., , 96 So.
Soniat v. White 99 So. 223 La. 1923

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by