Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Prichard v. McCranie, 107 So. 461.
- Katz v. Sobel 126 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Succession of McGeary 56 So. 2d 727 La. 1951
- Succession of McGeary 56 So. 2d 727 La. 1951
- Demoruelle v. Allen 50 So. 2d 208 La. 1950
- Sun Oil Co. v. Smith 43 So. 2d 148 La. 1949
- Successions of Scardino 40 So. 2d 923 La. 1949
-
Fabacher v. Fabacher
39 So. 2d 426
La. 1949
Mitch-am v. Mitcham, supra; , 107 So.
-
Doll v. Doll
19 So. 2d 249
La. 1944
Granting, therefore, that this is not the partition of a succession, but that it is one among co-owners — and it has been treated as the latter by all of the parties to this suit— then from every standpoint the amount is not an amount to be collated by force of any article of the Code.” , loc.cit.
- Montz v. Montz 2 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1941
-
Caraway v. Hebert
182 So. 164
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
27 ; Prichard et al., v. McCranie et al., , 107 So.
- Miller v. Murphy 174 So. 272 La. 1937
- Mitcham v. Mitcham 173 So. 132 La. 1937
- Stoma v. Smith 172 So. 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937