Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Strauss v. Insurance Co. of North America, 102 So. 861.

24 citing documents.

Clifton v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. CO. 510 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Evans v. Ivy 428 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
A review of the jurisprudence in this state on fraud will show that the courts have long held that an accusation of fraud is a serious one ( , 102 So.
Capital Bank & Trust Co. v. Core 343 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Parker v. Rhodes 260 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
Fedele v. St. Romain 242 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Alexander v. Alexander 233 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Collier v. Administrator, Succession of Blevins 136 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Gross v. Brooks 130 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Newell v. Rountree Olds-Cadillac Co. 129 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Johnston v. Bearden 127 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Mims v. Hilliard 125 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
Garcia v. Dulcich 111 So. 2d 309 La. 1959
McClatchey v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Company 85 So. 2d 6 La. 1955
Succession of Nelson 70 So. 2d 665 La. 1953
Co. of North America, , 102 So.
McGee v. Finley 65 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
Buxton v. McKendrick 64 So. 2d 844 La. 1953
92 , it is declared: “Two things are necessary to constitute fraud: the intention to defraud, and actual loss or damage, or such strong probability of it as will induce a court to interfere.” So.
Sanders v. Sanders 62 So. 2d 284 La. 1952
Blanchard v. Kemp 51 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
State Ex Rel. Woodard v. Ozley 14 So. 2d 452 La. 1943
Richardson v. Helis 189 So. 454 La. 1939
Antley v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans 164 So. 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Civil Code, art. 1848; , 102 So.
Garnier v. Aetna Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. 159 So. 705 La. 1935
Buccola v. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford 137 So. 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
662 , : “For false swearing In proofs of loss to prevent recovery on fire policy assured must have made false statements knowingly and willfully, with intent to deceive insurer concerning matter material to insurance.” The authorities quoted by plaintiff seem to be in point and applicable to the facts of this case.
Hemler v. Hawkins 3 La. App. 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
“Fraud is never imputed, except on legal and convincing evidence produced by one alleging it.” Strauss vs. Insurance Co. of N. A., , 102 South.