Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vial, 96 So. 796.

19 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Vincent Marinello La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Also, (citations omitted), the supreme court explained that: The mere fact that a member of a grand jury has made an affidavit against a citizen for the violation of a criminal statute does not disqualify such member and render him incompetent to deliberate upon the case and to vote f
State v. Marinello 49 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith 470 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Jones 345 So. 2d 1157 La. 1977
State v. Edwards 287 So. 2d 518 La. 1973
State v. Cooley 257 So. 2d 400 La. 1972
State v. Brazile 99 So. 2d 62 La. 1958
State v. Pizzolotto 25 So. 2d 292 La. 1946
American Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Shaddinger 16 So. 2d 889 La. 1944
State v. Oliver 192 So. 725 La. 1939
State v. Migues 184 So. 540 La. 1938
State v. Dallao 175 So. 4 La. 1937
State v. Richardson 144 So. 587 La. 1932
State v. Anthony 117 So. 921 La. 1928
Statements made by a persqn on leaving home, on a train, are admissible to show purpose to leave.” See, also, to the same effect, , 95 So.
State v. Domingue 118 So. 46 La. 1928
State v. Fuller 114 So. 606 La. 1927
State v. Dunn 109 So. 56 La. 1926
State v. Harvey 106 So. 28 La. 1925
204 ; State v. Vial (by Justice Land) , 96 So.
State v. Webb 103 So. 191 La. 1925
887 , , this court said: “Where bill of exceptions fails to show what witness answered to question objected to, it does not disclose prejudice.” Bill No. 2 was reserved to the exclusion of testimony offered to prove a • dying declaration.