River & Rails Terminals, Inc. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.
River & Rails Terminals, Inc. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co., 103 So. 331 (La. 1925).
Cited by
- Davis v. Clemmons 205 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- C H F Finance Co. v. Smith 151 So. 2d 364 La. 1963
- Ellzey v. Glaser 128 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Hooter v. Farrar 113 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- State ex rel. Poche v. Police Jury of St. James Parish 109 So. 2d 83 La. 1959
- Thompson v. Bamburg 93 So. 2d 666 La. 1957
- Spiers v. Davidson 83 So. 2d 653 La. 1955
- Waguespack v. Richard 57 So. 2d 220 La. 1952
- Mills v. Knox 55 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
- Vidrine v. Soileau 33 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
- Succession of Savoie 196 So. 923 La. 1940
- Mossler Acceptance Co. v. Moliere 181 So. 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State ex rel. Dixon v. Judge of the Fifth District Court 26 La. Ann. 119
- Saloy v. Collins 30 La. Ann. 63
- Hauch v. E. C. Drew Inv. Co. 116 La. 488
- State ex rel. Broussard v. Dallas 40 So. 847
- 123 La. 958 not in our corpus
- Smith v. Huie-Hodge Lumber Co. 49 So. 655
- 145 La. 1007 not in our corpus
- James v. St. Charles Hotel Co. 83 So. 222
- 52 La. Ann. 497 not in our corpus
- 26 So. 994 not in our corpus
Opinion text
THOMPSON, J. This is an appeal from a judgment which sustained an exception of no cause of action, dissolved the injunction, and dismissed the plaintiff’s suit. Our attention has been called to the fact that no judgment was signed and none appears in the record. Code Prac. art. 546, provides that the judge must sign all definitive or final judgments rendered by him, and it is well settled by the decisions of this court that no appeal lies from an unsigned judgment. State ex rel. Dixon v. Judge, 26 La. Ann. 119 ; Saloy v. Collins, 30 La. Ann. 63 ; Hauch v. Drew, 116 La. 488 , 40 So. 847 ; Mitchell v. Creosoting Co., 123 La. 958 , 49 So. 655 ; James v. Hotel, 145 La. 1007 , 83 So. 222 . That a judgment dismissing a suit on the ground that the petition discloses no cause of action is a final judgment which must be signed is equally well settled. Nicholls v. Maddox, 52 La. Ann. 497 , 26 So. 994 ; James v. St. Charles Hotel Co., 145 La. 1007 , 83 So. 222 . For the reasons assigned, the appeal herein is dismissed at appellant’s costs.