Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Augustin v. Farnsworth, 99 So. 868.
- State Ex Rel. Parish of Plaquemines v. Baynard 16 So. 2d 451 La. 1943
- Kothe v. Von Behren 5 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Hope v. Madison 187 So. 28 La. 1939
- City of Monroe v. Glasscock, Morrison, Conner Const. Co. 178 So. 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1938
- Olsen v. Tung 155 So. 16 La. 1934
- Greater New Orleans Homestead Ass'n v. Korner 142 So. 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Barcelo v. Barcelo 139 So. 765 La. 1932
- Overruled Foster & Glassell Co. v. Harrison 138 So. 99 La. 1931
- Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. Savant 134 So. 394 La. 1931
-
Cory v. Askew
123 So. 435
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
ther one should be held to have acquiesced in a judgment, by reason of some action taken thereunder, relates somewhat to the intent of the per *646 son taking the action, and in the case of Kittredge vs. Grau, supra, it was held that the plaintiff, who had recorded the judgment, had not acquiesced therein, within the meaning of article 567, and the same ruling was made in Augustin vs. Farnsworth, , 99 So.
-
Fitzgerald v. Katzenstein & Wiener
5 La. App. 28
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
In support of their contention, counsel cite the cases of Augustin vs. Farnsworth, et al., , 99 South.
-
Fitzgerald v. Katzenstein
105 So. 226
La. 1925
I. Plaintiff, therefore, claim's of defendant one-half the value of said wall in 1919, say $3,784.06, relying on article 684, R. C. C., , 99 So.
- Canal-Villere Realty Co. v. S. Gumble Realty & Securities Co. 1 La. App. 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924