Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Turner v. Snype, 110 So. 109.
-
Milliman v. Peterman
519 So. 2d 238
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
[3] The two cases cited in Rebman, supra; , 110 So.
- TEACHERS'RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. Louisiana State Emp. Ret. 444 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- Manning v. Bergeron 430 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Louisiana Sav. Ass'n
386 So. 2d 96
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
For the second reason given, that Bandaries as a partner could not assign a direct interest in the leasehold, defendant-appellant cites a number of cases: , 110 So.
-
Rebman v. Reed
335 So. 2d 37
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
art. 2275, 2776, 2992, 2997; , 110 So.
- White v. Batson 317 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
- King v. Hutchinson 303 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- Bray v. Boyd 286 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
-
Rebman v. Reed
274 So. 2d 850
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
2275, 2440 and 2997; , 110 So.
- Paul Voisin Corp. v. Torrey 271 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Bolding v. Eason Oil Co. 170 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1965
- La Nasa v. Wiener 127 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Lake v. Le Jeune 74 So. 2d 899 La. 1954
-
Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Saint Denis Securities Co.
72 So. 2d 257
La. 1954
117, and authorities there cited; Di Christina v. Weiser, 215 La.
-
Brantley v. Tugwell
68 So. 2d 793
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
324 ; Turner v. Snype, 1926, , 110 So.
- Krupp v. Nelson 50 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
-
Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. Evans
50 So. 2d 203
La. 1950
See Civil Code, Articles 2275 and 2992; , 110 So.
- Bordelon v. Crabtree 43 So. 2d 682 La. 1949
- Di Cristina v. Weiser 42 So. 2d 868 La. 1949
- Parham v. Gaspard 26 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
- Gulf Refining Co. v. Evans 181 So. 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
- Vanzant v. Morgan 181 So. 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
-
Bywater v. Enderle
145 So. 118
La. 1932
The alleged agency of the wife was denied by the husband in the only means of proof available to defendant in the absence of written authority ( , 110 So.
-
Landry v. Blache
137 So. 208
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
120 , , in which our Supreme Court said: “As the law requires that a contract to buy or sell real estate must be in writing, so also must a power of attorney to make such contract be in writing.
- Succession of Walsh 131 So. 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930