Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., 110 So. 178.

29 citing documents.

RAJ v. Tomasetti 986 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 1 Cir. 2/27/02), -91 , citing Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Montz v. Theard 818 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
The court relied on its earlier decision in Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Philippi v. Viguerie 606 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Mason v. Coen 449 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
White v. Crook 426 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
As to the validity of penal clauses such as this one, see Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Associated Press v. Toledo Investments, Inc. 389 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Griffin cited supra and Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Mossy Enterprises, Inc. v. Piggy-Bak Cartage Corp. 177 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
400; Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Farthing v. Neely 129 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
v. Codifer and Vonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Scott v. Apgar 113 So. 2d 457 La. 1959
In Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Pennington v. Drews 49 So. 2d 5 La. 1949
898 and Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Morris Buick Co. v. Ray 43 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
v. Codifer Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Canepa v. Jackson 18 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Reimann v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 187 So. 30 La. 1939
229 ; Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Rainey v. McCrocklin 185 So. 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
See Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Cointment v. Segrest 184 So. 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Chauvin v. Theriot 180 So. 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Ekman v. Vallery 169 So. 521 La. 1936
As said by this court in Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Williams v. Delacroix Corporation 160 So. 444 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1935
They cite Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Criticized Victor v. Lewis 158 So. 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
536 , and not Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Victor v. Lewis 157 So. 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Cloverland Dairy Products Co. v. Grace 157 So. 393 La. 1934
675 ; Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Claude Neon Federal Co. of Shreveport v. Angell 153 So. 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
216 ; Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Chavez v. United Motor Car Co. 151 So. 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
675 ; Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
United Carbon Co. v. Interstate Natural Gas Co. 147 So. 37 La. 1933
675 ; Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Shreveport Laundries, Inc. v. Teagle 139 So. 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
675 ; Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Subdivision Realty Co. v. Woulfe 135 So. 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Powell v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc. 118 So. 817 La. 1928
Plaintiff is not suing for the recovery of the amount paid by her on account of the purchase price; hence our decision in Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., , 110 So.
Blanchard v. Haber 118 So. 117 La. 1928
675 ; Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.
Schluter v. Gentilly Terrace Co. 8 La. App. 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
In the case of Heeb vs. Codifer & Bonnabel, , 110 So.