Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Prescott v. Central Contracting Co., 111 So. 269.
- Miller v. Lambert 380 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
- Gregory v. Guarisco 320 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
- Pear v. Labiche's Inc. 288 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
- Royal Insurance Co. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 256 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Waters v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 212 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
- Samson v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 205 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
-
Smith v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance
175 So. 2d 414
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
A tort has been generally defined as a breach or a disregard of a legal duty, , 111 So.
-
Ewen v. Bloch
173 So. 2d 314
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Co. v. H. H. Bain Roofing Co., La.App., , , 111 So.
-
Williams v. JB Levert Land Company
162 So. 2d 53
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
In support of this latter contention esteemed counsel for plaintiff relies, inter alia, , 111 So.
- Marsalis v. La Salle 94 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
-
Habetz v. Vida Sugars, Inc.
87 So. 2d 223
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
[885], 886, [ ] from which we quote as follows : “‘2.
-
Davis v. Horne Lumber Co.
34 So. 2d 914
La. 1948
894 ; Prescott v. Central Contracting Co. , 111 So.
- Stewart v. Palmisano 31 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
- Weadock v. Eagle Indemnity Co. 15 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
-
Wilson v. National Casualty Co.
191 So. 574
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
“It is a well-recognized rule of law that negligence is the violation or disregard of some duty.” , 111 So.
-
Bruchis v. Victory Oil Co.
153 So. 828
La. 1934
Oounsel'for plaintiff cite the following Louisiana cases in support of their contention: , 111 So.
- Standard Insurance v. Holzer Sheet Metal Works, Inc. 130 So. 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930