Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McGee v. Collins, 100 So. 430.

25 citing documents.

Bujol v. Ward 778 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Dussouy v. Gulf Coast Investment Corp. 433 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Ardoyno v. Ungar 352 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Defendant attorneys, , 100 So.
State v. Time, Inc. 249 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Walker v. Associated Press 191 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
Dickson v. Sandefur 181 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
McKnight v. Scott 130 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission v. Morley 93 So. 2d 912 La. 1957
Succession of Kippers 91 So. 2d 346 La. 1956
Mundy v. Gentilly Oaks, Inc. 82 So. 2d 849 La. 1955
67 C.J.S., Parties, § 40, p. 962; , 100 So.
Brown v. Lambert 71 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Richard v. Kansas City So. Ry. Co. 55 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Ashley v. Baggett 53 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Jefferson 44 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Jacobs v. Bendlea 26 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Copellar v. Britt 188 So. 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
994 , that: “There is a misjoinder of defendants where there is no joint liability *406 for loss, or privity of contract, between them or some of them.” , 100 So.
&198tna Casualty Surety Co. v. Flair 177 So. 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
n be raised only by the party improperly joined and cannot be raised by another defendant, who is properly joined and against whom a cause of action is stated', especially where the_ misjoined defendant raises no objection, although there is some common law authority to the contrary with regard to actions ex contractu.” , 100 So.
Walsh v. Bertel 175 So. 605 La. 1937
Gates v. Bisso Ferry Co. 172 So. 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
759 : “Where an exception of misjoinder of defendants is sustained, the court cannot discriminate by dismissing the suit as to one defendant, rather than another, but must, ordinarily, dismiss it as to all.” See, also, , 100 So.
Lykes Bros. Ripley S. S. Co. v. Wiegand Marionneaux Lumber Co. 171 So. 453 La. 1936
If, as the consequence of acts of commission or omission, the solidary liability of two or more persons to another arises, such persons may be sued at one and the same time in the same action for a judgment in solido against them.” , 100 So.
McDonald v. Lieber 167 So. 450 La. 1936
Oakes v. Walther 154 So. 26 La. 1934
Dubuisson v. Long 143 So. 494 La. 1932
They cite also two cases, , 100 So.
Dubuisson v. Long 143 So. 494 La. 1932
They cite also two cases, , 100 So.
Deon v. Kirby Lumber Co. 111 So. 55 La. 1926