State v. Bailey
State v. Bailey, 97 So. 851 (La. 1923).
Cited by
- State v. Jones 922 So. 2d 508 La. 2006
- State v. Ferguson 474 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Nedds 364 So. 2d 588 La. 1978
- State v. Flattmann 135 So. 3 La. 1931
- State v. Jacques 132 So. 657 La. 1931
- State v. Hill 130 So. 865 La. 1930
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Thompson 104 La. 167
- State v. Beebe 127 La. 493
- State v. Reeves 128 La. 37
- 150 La. 494 not in our corpus
- 150 La. 944 not in our corpus
- State v. Hataway 153 La. 751
Opinion text
O’NIELL, C. J. The district attorney concedes that the verdict and sentence in thi? *537 case are null because the defendant, appellant, was tried by a jury composed of 12 members for a crime for which he should have been tried by a jury of only 5 members. Const, art. 7, § 41; State v. Thompson, 104 La. 167 , 28 South. 882 ; State v. Beebe, 127 La. 493 , 53 South. 730 ; State v. Reeves, 128 La. 37 , 54 South. 415 ; State v. Desselles, 150 La. 494 , 90 South. 773 ; State v. Stephens, 150 La. 944 , 91 South. 349 , 23 A. L. R. 286; State v. Hataway, 153 La. 751 , 96 South. 556 . The verdict and sentence are annulled, and it is ordered that the case be remanded to the criminal district court for a new trial.