Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, 105 So. 620.
-
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Capitano
204 So. 2d 710
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1967
Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 105 So.
-
Levingston Supply Co. v. Basso
164 So. 2d 141
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Without citation of authority or other explanation, the Supreme Court in Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 105 So.
-
Schecter v. Camden Fire Insurance
141 So. 2d 451
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 105 So.
-
Tyler v. Great American Indemnity Co.
116 So. 2d 717
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
The Supreme Court has held that damages for a frivolous appeal, under Code of Practice, Article 907, is unwarranted unless it is manifest that the appeal was taken solely for purposes of delay, and was completely without merit; Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 105 So.
-
Ardoin v. Travelers Insurance Co.
116 So. 2d 841
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 105 So.
-
Thornton v. Willis
106 So. 2d 337
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Silberberg v. Kalil & Miclcal, , 105 So.
-
Mayronne Lumber & Supply Co. v. Houston Fire & Casualty Ins.
74 So. 2d 198
La. 1954
Silber *1021 berg v. Kalin & Mickal, , 105 So.
-
Guidroz v. O'Neil
57 So. 2d 703
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 105 So.
-
Tomasella v. Spano
9 So. 2d 465
La. 1942
Code of Practice, Article 907; Mayor etc., v. Davis, 4 Mart.,O.S., 533; Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 185 So.
-
Nolen v. Davidson's Succession
190 So. 826
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 105 So.
-
Kirsch v. Broas
170 So. 554
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1936
In Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 105 So.
-
Tulane Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Singer Lumber Co.
168 So. 368
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 105 So.
-
Holliman v. Southern Kraft Corporation
157 So. 743
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
117 ; Silberberg v. Kalil & Mickal, , 105 So.
- Anderson v. Louisiana Oil Refg. Corp. 134 So. 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
-
Beaird v. Ward
7 La. App. 117
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
*118 “Allowance of damages under Code of Practice, Article 907, for prosecution of appeal as frivolous, held unwarranted where it was not manifest that appeal was taken merely for delay, nor that appellants did not believe in the merit of their defense.” Silberberg vs. Kalil & Mickil, , 105 So.