DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Opdenwyer v. Brown, 99 So. 482.

82 citing documents.

  • Rock v. Varuso 61 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
  • Vicknair v. Langridge 57 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
  • Smith v. Scarpengos 56 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    He then concludes that the line pointed out by Jones to defendant was in error, , 99 So.
  • Overruled Tate v. Cutrer 53 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    854 , which, as pointed out by the Orleans Court, , 99 So.
  • Crow v. Braley 47 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
  • Picou v. Curole 44 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
  • Broussard v. Winn 41 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • Conrad v. Roussell 37 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
  • Lavergne v. Sonnier 20 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
  • State v. Aucoin 20 So. 2d 136 La. 1944
  • Lincoln v. Fomby 16 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
  • Henly v. Kask 11 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
  • Latiolais v. Robert 8 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    That is the law as embodied in Art. 852 of the Revised Civil Code, , 99 So.
  • Kobler v. Koch 6 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    In construing that article, along with other provisions found in Book 2, Title 5 of the Civil Code, , 99 So.
  • Foscue v. Mitchell 182 So. 740 La. 1938
  • Hill v. Taylor 174 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
  • Simmons v. Miller 170 So. 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    With regard to the plea of 30 years’ prescription, , 99 So.
  • Aubrey v. Deggs 165 So. 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
  • Brumfield v. Cryer 154 So. 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
  • De Bakey v. Prater 147 So. 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
  • Emmer v. Rector 143 So. 11 La. 1932
  • Police Jury of Vermilion Parish v. Marceaux 126 So. 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    802 ; Opdenwyer vs. Brown, , 99 So.
  • Blanchard v. Monrose 125 So. 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    In support of the contention that there can be no action in boundary where there has been a visible separation of the property, defendant calls our attention to the case of Opdenwyer vs. Brown, , 99 So.
  • Cutrer v. Dyson 123 So. 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
    There is no reason why the court should attempt to determine the proper location of the northern boundary line of section 55, inasmuch as the plea of prescription advanced by plaintiffs is established by a preponderance of the testimony and must be maintained in obedience to the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Opdenweyer vs. Brown, , 99 So.
  • Carr v. Geoghegan 123 So. 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
    In support of the contention that there can be no action in boundary where there has been a visible separation of the property, defendant calls our attention to the case of Opdenwyer vs. Brown, , 99 So.
  • Sliman v. Joseph 118 So. 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1928
    869 , cited in plaintiff’s brief, and Babineau vs. Cormier, 1 N. S. 456; Broussard vs. Duhamel, 3 N. S. 11, and Opdenweyer vs. Brown, , 99 So.
  • Falvy v. Sellers 116 So. 853 La. 1928
    617, , 'in which two divisions of this court, composed of six of its present justices, held that— “When the two estates have never been separated, the boundaries must be fixed according to the respective titles.
  • Morris v. Prutsman 7 La. App. 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
  • McCahill v. Wood 4 La. App. 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    392 ; Opdenwyer vs. Brown, , 99 South.
  • Waguespack v. Lower Lafourche Planting Mfg. Co. 107 So. 901 La. 1926
  • State v. Hemler 102 So. 316 La. 1924
  • Capo v. Blanchard 1 La. App. 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
    The defendants rely upon Opdennoyer vs. Brown, , 99 South.