DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Adams, 98 So. 403.

19 citing documents.

  • Red River v. Noles 406 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • Terrebonne Parish Police Jury v. Matherne 405 So. 2d 314 La. 1981
    877 , (1923); Ludeling v. Stubbs, 34 La.Ann.
  • David v. Dixie Rice Agricultural Corp. 379 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    877 , (1923); Chandler v. City of Shreveport, 169 La.
  • Cole v. Mott 351 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    877 , (1923) an injunction was issued requiring defendant to remove a levee obstructing a servitude of drain in order to facilitate the raising of rice on the dominant estate.
  • Poole v. Guste 262 So. 2d 339 La. 1972
    877 , (1923); and to what extent, if any, such more burdensome use of the natural servitude of drain exceeded or was contrary to it, Articles 660, 790, Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, Volume 1, Section 2903 (Louisiana State Law Institute Translation, 1959), so as to alter it or substitute for it a conventional servitude create
  • Long v. Childress 255 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Poole v. Guste 246 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    877 , , wherein the Court said: “If the natural drain was west and not north, as contended for by the defendant, there would, it seems to us, have been no occasion for the defendant to maintain the levee south of his ditch and next to the line of plaintiff’s property.
  • Pearce v. Gunter 221 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Distinguished Wild v. LeBlanc 191 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
  • Gamburg v. City of Alexandria 85 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    877 , , wherein a servitude was recognized under LSA-C.C.
  • Harris v. Pierce 73 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
  • Godchaux Sugars, Inc. v. Ockman 68 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1953
  • Cornett v. Hebert 31 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    877 , , to have some bearing for the court, in discussing this particular provision of Art. 660, R.C.C., Stated: "And the proprietor above can do nothing whereby the natural servitude due by the estate below may be rendered more burdensome.
  • Baton Rouge Bldg. Trades Council v. T. L. James & Co. 10 So. 2d 606 La. 1942
  • Prescott v. Prescott 141 So. 88 La. 1932
  • Stephens v. Jones 129 So. 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    877 , ; C. C. art. 823 et seq.), but appellee urges that the action does not involve the title of the respective parties to the properties, and that the provision in the statute, that the court has not jurisdiction of actions where the title to real estate is involved, should be construed as including only actions when the
  • Chandler v. City of Shreveport 124 So. 143 La. 1929
  • Town of Leesville v. Kapotsky 122 So. 59 La. 1929
    877 , , and authorities therein cited.
  • Louisiana Irrigation & Mill Co. v. Sixth Ward Drainage Dist. 104 So. 623 La. 1925
    877 , , and this court held (see syllabus No. 4): “Where two adjoining estates have practically the same elevation, but there is a difference of a few inches whereby the natural drainage of water is over the lower estate, the proprietor of such lower estate has no right to erect levees diverting the flow of water, and manda