Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. Briede, 100 So. 722.

13 citing documents.

Benoit v. International Harvester Company 251 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
Lacroix v. Finke 85 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1956
udge, after correctly setting forth the extent of the physical injuries, said that “the amount of recovery for personal injuries probably should be a little higher,” but he made the awards *68 quite low in view of the fact “that the defendant is ‘impecunious, without insurance'; earns $60 a week, and has a wife and two children to support.” , 100 So.
Hartman v. Aschaffenburg 12 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Moore v. O'Hara 8 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
162 , where $5,000 was allowed for libel, , 100 So.
Seither v. Poter 194 So. 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
In view of the fact that the record rather conclusively shows poverty on the part of the defendants and inability to respond in damages, , 100 So.
Walsh v. Bertel 169 So. 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Ory v. Bosio 159 So. 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Bache v. Stoltz 134 So. 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Goldsmith v. Unity Industrial Life Insurance 128 So. 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Jackson vs. Briede, , 100 So.
Perez-Sandi v. Berges 125 So. 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
We feel, however, in this case, very much as the Supreme Court expressed itself in Jackson vs. Briede, , 100 South.
Thiel v. Shiff 7 La. App. 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
439 ; Jackson vs. Briede, , 100 So.
Gallman v. Young 6 La. App. 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
452 ; Jackson vs. Briede, (585), 100 South.
Ford v. Jeane 106 So. 558 La. 1925