Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Robinson-Slagle Lumber Co. v. Rudy, 100 So. 296.
-
IE Miller of Eunice, Inc. v. Source Petroleum, Inc.
484 So. 2d 239
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
22 ; Robinson-Slagle Lumber Co. v. Rudy, 1924, , 100 So.
-
Western Wireline Services, Inc. v. Pecos Western Corp.
377 So. 2d 892
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
22 ; Robinson-Slagle Lumber Co. v. Rudy, 1924, , 100 So.
-
Glassell, Taylor & Robinson v. John W. Harris Associates, Inc.
26 So. 2d 1
La. 1946
The owner referred to throughout; the act is, obviously, , 100 So.
-
Alcus v. City of New Orleans
187 So. 557
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1939
In Robinson-Slagle Lumber Company, Inc. v. Rudy, et al., , 100 So.
-
Carr v. Eby
177 So. 455
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
ontractors, etc., provides that any person claiming a privilege under the act ‘shall file in the office of the recorder of mortgages in the parish in which the land is situated, a statement setting forth the amount claimed,’ etc., and, *459 “ ‘Such statement must be filed within forty-five days (45) after the acceptance of the work by the owner.’ “ , 100 So.
- Goldberg v. Banta Bros. 162 So. 786 La. 1935
- R. B. Tyler Co. v. Merrill Engineering Co. 159 So. 319 La. 1935
- Conservative Homestead Ass'n v. Guglielmo 151 So. 899 La. 1933
- City of Shreveport v. Urban Land Co. 146 So. 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- City of Shreveport v. Urban Land Co. 148 So. 256 La. 1933
- Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co. v. City of Shreveport 136 So. 26 La. 1931
-
Central Lumber Co. v. Whittington
127 So. 79
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
179 , , the statute considered was more specific as to the substance of the instrument to he record *698 ed than the1 statute considered here, and although the statute considered in the cited case stated that that instrument filed for record should set forth the name of the owner, it was not held that where the name of the
- Cook v. Carter 106 So. 704 La. 1925