Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Loranger v. Citizens' Nat. Bank, 111 So. 418.

24 citing documents.

City Bank & Trust Co. v. Caneco Const., Inc. 341 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Bagby v. Clause 251 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Succession of Teagle 206 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Civil Code, article 2276; Loranger v. Citizens’ National Bank, , 111 So.
Locantro v. Petrie 144 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Wells v. Joseph 101 So. 2d 667 La. 1958
Bank of Hammond, , 111 So.
Fluker Farms, Inc. v. James 79 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Bishop v. Copeland 62 So. 2d 486 La. 1952
Lewis v. Clay 60 So. 2d 78 La. 1952
Quatre Parish Co. v. Beauregard Parish School Board 57 So. 2d 197 La. 1952
Dartez v. Meaux 44 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Ryals v. Ryals 199 So. 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Counsel for plaintiffs earnestly argues that Loranger v. Citizens’ National Bank of Hammond, , 111 So.
Rawlings v. Stokes 193 So. 589 La. 1940
671 ; Loranger v. Citizens’ Bank, , 111 So.
Derryberry v. Matterson 192 So. 78 La. 1939
Bank of Hammond, , at page 1058, 111 So.
Wainwright v. Gilham 188 So. 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
art. 1900; Loranger v. Citizens’ National Bank of Hammond (No. 26291 on our docket) , 111 So.
Drewett v. Carnahan 183 So. 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
»Civil Code, article 2276; Loranger v. Citizens’ National Bank, , 111 So.
Phillips v. Gillaspie. 167 So. 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Article 2276 of the Revised Civil Code; Loranger v. Citizens’ Bank, , 111 So.
Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Willis 162 So. 822 La. 1935
Goldsmith v. Parsons 161 So. 175 La. 1935
McConnell v. Harris Chevrolet Co. 147 So. 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
R. C. C. art. 1900; Loranger v. Citizens’ National Bank of Hammond (No. 26291 on our docket) , 111 So.
United Gas Public Service Co. v. Roy 147 So. 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
“Oonstruetion 6yi parties—Effect.—When the intent of the parties is doubtful, the construction put upon it, by the manner in which it has been executed by both, or by one with the express or implied assent of the other, furnishes a rule for its interpretation.” “Conveyance records are only things to which one dealing with real estate or any real right ever need look.” Loranger v. Citizens’ Bank, , 111 So.
Kirtman v. Upkins 135 So. 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Bank of Hammond, , 111 So.
Gabert v. St. Tammany Yacht Club 116 So. 667 La. 1928
The case is easily distinguished from Loranger v. Citizens’ National Bank, , 111 So.
Succession of Rhodes 114 So. 107 La. 1927
R. C. C. art. 1900; Loranger v. Citizens’ National Bank of Hammond (No. 26291 on our docket) , 111 So.
Whittington v. Heirs of Pegues 115 So. 441 La. 1927