No. 26296.
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
State v. Carlander
State v. Carlander, 103 So. 755 (La. 1923).
Cited by
- State v. Guillot 9 So. 2d 235 La. 1942
- State v. Berry 177 So. 684 La. 1937
- State v. Hart 164 So. 166 La. 1935
- State v. Shelfer 116 So. 825 La. 1928
- State v. Scott 103 So. 757 La. 1924
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Hebert 103 So. 742
Opinion text
On Rehearing. By the WHOLE COURT. PER CURIAM. A rehearing was granted in this case upon the point alone de *249 cidecl in State v. Doras Hebert (No. 26105) 103 So. 742 , 1 on the - day of April, 1924; that is, as to the right of the lower court to impose an alternative jail sentence under section 980 of the R. S., for failure to pay the fine imposed under Act No. 39 of 1921 known as the Hood Bill. For the reasons assigned in the Hebert Case on rehearing, the judgment and sentence are affirmed. O’NIELL, C. J., and ROGERS and BRU-NOT, JJ., dissent. 1 Ante, p. 209.