Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. Curran, 101 So. 415.

21 citing documents.

Hamilton v. Royal Intern. Petroleum Corp. 934 So. 2d 25 La. 2006
Giordano v. Riverbend Rentals Co. 674 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
47:2180 is null and relies on cases from the first half of this century that describe the notice of delinquency and sale as “sacramental.” See, , 101 So.
Constance v. Sudwischer 502 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
516 (1931); Recker v. Dupuy, supra; , 101 So.
Hubbs v. Canova 392 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Doll v. Montgomery 58 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1952
140 ; Recker v. Dupuy, supra; , 101 So.
Alba v. Holstead 23 So. 2d 100 La. 1945
Messina v. Owens 22 So. 2d 286 La. 1945
628 ; Citing Jones v. Curran, supra [ , 101 So.
Ward v. South Coast Corporation 3 So. 2d 689 La. 1941
Pill v. Morgan 172 So. 409 La. 1936
Calcasieu Mercantile Co. v. Frank 161 So. 201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1935
Federal Land Bank v. Scallan 154 So. 632 La. 1934
Carey v. Green 144 So. 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Cook v. Morgan 142 So. 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Regina Lumber Co. v. Perkins 142 So. 785 La. 1932
Carey v. Green 141 So. 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
It has always been recognized that a strict observance of the formalities called for by the law is exacted in matters of tax sales, — a stricter observance in fact than in almost any forced proceeding under and through which ownership of property is made to shift.” , 101 So.
Lee v. Givens 134 So. 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Salsman v. Bloom 133 So. 760 La. 1931
Hicks & Richardson Co. v. Gearreald 6 La. App. 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1927
430 ; Jones vs. Curran, , 101 South.
Curran v. Jones 112 So. 492 La. 1927
The case was heard, on appeal, in 1924 ( , 101 So.
Jackson v. Lamb 4 La. App. 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
859 ; Jones vs. Curran, , 101 South.
Recker v. Dupuy 108 So. 782 La. 1926
See, in this connection, , 101 So.