Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ward v. Hayes-Ewell Co., 98 So. 740.
-
Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Lewis
68 So. 2d 913
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
727 ; Ward v. Hayes-Ewell Co., 1924, , 98 So.
- Livaudais v. Williams Lumber Co. 34 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
- Kay Kay v. Fountain 28 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
- Sabatier v. Canal Oil Co. 12 So. 2d 665 La. 1942
- Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. Burns 186 So. 85 La. 1939
- Weaver Bros. Lumber Corp. v. Beasley 157 So. 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Leopold v. Bradford-Hutchinson Lumber Co. 133 So. 379 La. 1931
- Bodcaw Lumber Co. of Louisiana, Inc. v. Clifton Heirs 126 So. 52 La. 1930
-
Willetts Wood Products Co. v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.
124 So. 841
La. 1929
18 , , “that this court has always held, * * *' that standing timber was property subject to be acquired separately from the land on which it grows; but that when sold it must be cut and removed within the period agreed upon by the parties or fixed by the court in default of agreement; otherwise said timber reverts to
- Ward v. Hayes-Ewell Co. 120 So. 585 La. 1929
-
Louisiana Cent, Lumber Co. v. Womack
119 So. 741
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1929
* * *” Ward vs. Hayes-Ewell Co., , 98 So.
- Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. Canulette Shipbuilding Co. 113 So. 855 La. 1927
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. Hilgner 100 So. 407 La. 1924
- Industrial Lumber Co. v. Rogers 104 So. 367 La. 1923