Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Logan v. State Gravel Co., 103 So. 526.

35 citing documents.

Fuselier v. Estate of Peschier 525 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Lake Forest, Inc. v. Cirlot Co. 466 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Todd v. State Through Dept. of Natural Res. 456 So. 2d 1340 La. 1984
Mouton v. PAB, INC. 450 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Hall v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co. 359 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
Succession of Rugg 339 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
"Under this application of the law, it was inevitable that when the question arose *521 as to the nature of royalty, it was held to be rent in the form of a portion of the produce of the land, Logan v. State Gravel Co., supra [ , 103 So.
Lafayette Airport Commission v. Roy 265 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
For `rent (by whatever name called) is a certain profit in money, provisions, chattels or labor, issuing out of lands and tenements in retribution for the use.'" So.
Alvord v. Sun Oil Co. 251 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
773 , (1952) ; , 103 So.
Bouterie v. Kleinpeter 247 So. 2d 548 La. 1971
773 , (1952) ; , 103 So.
Arata v. Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District 225 So. 2d 362 La. 1969
The rent is always sufficiently certain “if it can be readily ascertained”, , 103 So.
Scott v. Hunt Oil Company 152 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
Pierce v. Atlantic Refining Company 140 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
McDonald v. O'Meara 139 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Bailey v. Meadows 130 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Davis v. Laster 130 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Melancon v. Texas Company 89 So. 2d 135 La. 1956
ysis of pertinent cases), and has given little trouble since this Court’s pronouncement of more than three decades *613 past that “ * * * a mine or quarry, or land adapted to mining or quarrying, may be leased for a certain portion of the produce of such mine or quarry, and the fact that such portion is called ‘royalty/ instead of rent, is not of the least consequence.” , 103 So.
Milling v. Collector of Revenue 57 So. 2d 679 La. 1952
796 ; the lessor’s lien and privilege to secure rentals was recognized under Articles 3218 and 3219, , 103 So.
Milling v. Collector of Revenue 57 So. 2d 679 La. 1952
796 ; the lessor's lien and privilege to secure rentals was recognized under Articles 3218 and 3219, , 103 So.
Sam v. Theriot 49 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Holloway Gravel Co. v. McKowen 9 So. 2d 228 La. 1942
Tyson v. Surf Oil Co. 196 So. 336 La. 1940
Parker v. Ohio Oil Co. 186 So. 604 La. 1939
United Gas Public Service Co. v. Barrett 179 So. 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Posey v. Fargo 174 So. 175 La. 1937
1045 ) and it is immaterial whether the rental consideration be termed “royalty” rather than “rent” ( , 103 So.
Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Calcasieu Real Estate & Oil Co. 170 So. 785 La. 1936
Defelice v. Autin 159 So. 648 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1935
Hinkle v. Grosjean 159 So. 314 La. 1935
Wright v. Imperial Oil & Gas Products Co. 148 So. 685 La. 1933
Lee v. Pearson 143 So. 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Roberson v. Pioneer Gas Co. 137 So. 46 La. 1931
Brewer v. Forest Gravel Co. 135 So. 372 La. 1931
Gordy v. Maestri 127 So. 628 La. 1930
Gonzales v. Watson 111 So. 416 La. 1927
Roussel v. Dalche 104 So. 637 La. 1925
In Logan v. State Gravel Co., ante, p. 105, , No. 26429 of our docket, decided March 2, 1925, we reviewed the authorities as to the nature of the consideration necessary to support a contract of lease, and our conclusion was (in effect) that any consideration sufficed which was or could be fixed in money, commodities, or labor, and which was not dependent on th
Roussel v. Dalche 104 So. 637 La. 1925
'In Logan v. State Gravel Co., ante, p. 105, , No. 26429 of our docket, decided March 2, 1925, we reviewed the authorities as to the nature of the consideration necessary to support a contract of lease, and our conclusion was (in effect) that any consideration sufficed which was or could be fixed in money, commodities, or labor, and which was not dependent on th