Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bozeman, 101 So. 4.
- Lieber v. Rust 398 So. 2d 519 La. 1981
- State v. Placid Oil Company 300 So. 2d 154 La. 1974
- State v. Placid Oil Company 274 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Carter v. Moore 248 So. 2d 813 La. 1971
- Hamilton v. City of Shreveport 168 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- State v. Cockrell 162 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
Thompson v. Bland Produce Co.
144 So. 2d 769
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
The trial court subsequently rescinded the order permitting the filing of the supplemental answer and the Court of Appeal held that the ruling was correct.” “ , 101 So.
-
Ruhlman v. Fremin
135 So. 2d 113
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
881 ; State of Louisiana vs. Bozeman, , 101 So.
- State v. Aucoin 20 So. 2d 136 La. 1944
- State v. Aucoin 20 So. 2d 136 La. 1944
- Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. State Mineral Board 14 So. 2d 61 La. 1943
-
Miami Corporation v. State
173 So. 315
La. 1936
It was so held in the following cases: , 101 So.
-
State v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining Co.
163 So. 145
La. 1935
24, 28 ], the Court therein held, quoting: “ ‘Since Black bayou was a navigable stream at the date of the admission of Louisiana into the Union, -all of its bed below its ordinary low-water mark became the property of the state, subject to the right of the public to navigate it and use its banks, in virtue of the state’s inherent sovereignty.’ “ [ 101 So.
-
State v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining Co.
163 So. 145
La. 1935
24, 28 ], the Court therein held, quoting: “ ‘Since Black bayou was a navigable stream at the date of the admission of Louisiana into the Union, all of its bed below its ordinary low-water mark became the property of the state, subject to the right of the public to navigate it and use its banks, in virtue of the state’s inherent sovereignty.’ “ [ 101 So.
-
Martin v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.
162 So. 257
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
After issue joined, the plaintiff may, with the leave of the court, amend his original petition; provided the amendment, does not alter the substance of his de-, mand by making it different from the one, originally brought.” , 101 So.
- Hartman-Salmen Co. v. Maloney 156 So. 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- State v. Erwin 138 So. 84 La. 1931
- New Orleans Land Co. v. Board of Levee Com'rs 132 So. 121 La. 1930
-
Jordan v. Checker Cab Co.
120 So. 426
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
State et al. vs. Bozeman et al., , 101 So.
- Parish of Caddo v. Parish of Bossier 113 So. 882 La. 1927
- Ellerbe v. Grace 111 So. 185 La. 1926
- Land v. Brockett 110 So. 740 La. 1926
- Brockett v. City of Shreveport 106 So. 710 La. 1925
- McGlothlin v. City of Shreveport 106 So. 708 La. 1925