Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brewton v. Brewton, 105 So. 307.
- Menville v. Stephens Chevrolet, Inc. 282 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
-
McManus v. McManus
250 So. 2d 498
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
other party.’ “In applying this provision, the courts have consistently held that the right of the mother to the custody of the minor child is paramount to that of the father, unless, in his discretion, the trial judge conchides it is for the greater advantage of the child that it he entrusted to the care of the father, which conclusion is, of course, , 105 So.
- Couty v. Ayres 248 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Franks v. Harper 134 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Diecidue v. Kilpatrick 86 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
- Willis v. Willis 24 So. 2d 378 La. 1945
- Willis v. Willis 24 So. 2d 378 La. 1945
- Sanford v. Sanford 24 So. 2d 145 La. 1945
- Scacciaferro v. Hymel 20 So. 2d 284 La. 1944
-
White v. Broussard
18 So. 2d 641
La. 1944
e other party.” In applying this provision, the courts have consistently held that the right of the mother to the custody of the minor child is paramount to that of the father, unless, in his discretion, the trial judge concludes it is for the greater advantage of the child that it be entrusted to the care of the father, which conclusion is, of course, , 105 So.
- Black v. Black 18 So. 2d 321 La. 1944
- Higginbotham v. Lofton 164 So. 255 La. 1935
- Person v. Person 135 So. 225 La. 1931