Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Giglio v. Giglio, 105 So. 95.
- Tuttle v. Tuttle 462 So. 2d 175 La. 1985
- Edwards v. Edwards 268 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
-
Lester v. Lester
245 So. 2d 478
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
igre v. Daigre, supra, involved the same type of a proceeding, and the wife’s suit was dismissed on the ground that it *484 involved a “piecemeal partition.” The court observed, however, that: “While it is true that after divorce the wife, as a joint owner, may sue her husband for a partition of the community property without alleging or proving the liquidation of the community, , 105 So.
-
Pennison v. Pennison
187 So. 2d 747
La. 1966
le v. Allen: “[N] either the spouses nor the heirs have anything to claim out of the acquets and gains ‘until all the debts are paid or liquidated.’ ” *601 In Daigre v. Daigre, the Court said: “While it is true that after divorce the wife, as a joint owner, may sue her husband for a partition of the community property without alleging or proving the liquidation of the community, , 105 So.
- Raia v. WWL-TV 176 So. 2d 390 La. 1965
- Raia v. WWL-TV 176 So. 2d 390 La. 1965
- Arcemont v. Arcemont 162 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
- Daigre v. Daigre 89 So. 2d 41 La. 1956
- Balis v. Mitchell 48 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
- Demoruelle v. Allen 50 So. 2d 208 La. 1950
- Washington v. Palmer 34 So. 2d 382 La. 1948
- Washington v. Palmer 28 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
- In Re F. H. Koretke Brass & Mfg. Co. 196 So. 917 La. 1940
- Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Reese 196 So. 558 La. 1940
-
Rhodes v. Rhodes
182 So. 541
La. 1938
Besides, as the sale to effect the partition in this case is not opposed by any creditor of either the community or of the separate spouses, the husband cannot champion the cause of the creditors, as *375 , 105 So.
- Adkins v. Cason 170 So. 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936