Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Poole, 100 So. 613.

23 citing documents.

State v. Rone 62 So. 2d 114 La. 1952
State v. Weber 61 So. 2d 883 La. 1952
State v. Cascio 54 So. 2d 95 La. 1951
An examination of the cases holding that it is essential that defendant request the .judge for instructions, even though his objection to the remarks has been denied, , 100 So-.
State v. Cox 49 So. 2d 12 La. 1950
State v. Borde 25 So. 2d 736 La. 1946
d not believe that he was guilty he would never have been brought to trial.” Under the jurisprudence of this state a district attorney is permitted a certain latitude in arguing his case so long as he remains within the bounds prescribed by law and counsel cannot complain about a statement made by the district attorney in his closing argument that was precipitated by such counsel ( , 100 So.
State v. Bryant 25 So. 2d 814 La. 1946
State v. Malmay 24 So. 2d 869 La. 1946
State v. Alberts 19 So. 2d 98 La. 1944
State v. Sims 1 So. 2d 541 La. 1941
State v. Gendusa 190 So. 332 La. 1939
State v. Maines 164 So. 321 La. 1935
State v. Pilcher 157 So. 591 La. 1934
State v. Disotell 158 So. 825 La. 1934
The rule was also approved and followed in the following eases, viz.: , 100 So.
State v. Scarbrock 145 So. 264 La. 1932
State v. Bridges 144 So. 602 La. 1932
State v. Brown 133 So. 383 La. 1931
State v. Stinson 125 So. 277 La. 1929
State v. Cullens 123 So. 645 La. 1929
State v. Dreher 118 So. 85 La. 1928
437, 438 , ; State v. Benoit, 144 La.
State v. Glauson 115 So. 484 La. 1928
State v. Genna 112 So. 655 La. 1927
State v. Joiner 109 So. 51 La. 1926
437 , ; and State v. Harvey, 159 La.
State v. Gani 102 So. 318 La. 1924