DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., 105 So. 234.

48 citing documents.

  • King v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co. 986 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    See National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • American Druggists Ins. Co. v. Henry Contracting, Inc. 505 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    In National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • CENT. METAIRIE CIVIC ASS'N, INC. v. Jefferson Parish Council 484 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    230, 233 , that `notice, in its accepted legal sense, means such information on the part of the person charged with notice as would put a prudent person on inquiry to ascertain the true or actual facts,' and in the case of National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Company, , 105 So.
  • Distinguished Credit Bureau of Morgan City-Berwick v. Electrical Systems & Service, Inc. 408 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Holliday v. Continental Can Co., Inc. 351 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
    Louisiana Civil Code Articles 3536, 3537; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Neyrey v. Lebrun 309 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    That court relied on National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Howard Construction Co. v. Huval 243 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Appellant also discussed National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Co. v. United States Rubber Co. 245 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    632 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp. 232 So. 2d 285 La. 1970
    231 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Cartwright v. Chrysler Corporation 232 So. 2d 285 La. 1970
    231 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Hayward v. Noel 225 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Articles 3536, 3537, Civil Code; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlanc 192 So. 2d 130 La. 1966
    National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Bailey v. American Marine & General Insurance 185 So. 2d 214 La. 1966
  • Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlanc 182 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    In the case of National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co. (1925) , 105 So.
  • Zurich Insurance Co. v. Grain Dealers Mutual Ins. Co. 169 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    See, also: National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Nettles v. Great American Insurance Company 155 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    632 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Anthon v. Knox 155 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Counsel for both parties rely for authority upon the case of National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Company, , 105 So.
  • Schouest v. Texas Crude Oil Co. 141 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Among the innumerable decisions so holding we note: National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Company, , 105 So.
  • Pachi v. Kammer 130 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    See also: Maxfield v. Gulf States Utilities Co., La.App., ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Radalec, Inc. 126 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    673 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Savoia v. Capello 119 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance v. Hillman 118 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    “In the case of National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Company, , 105 So.
  • Banks v. Yarborough 104 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    e examination made by the defendant’s attorneys prior to the purchase of August 19, 1924, disclosed that title to an undivided half interest was of record in the name of C. E. Thibodeaux, and that the company was acquiring only an undivided interest in the property; and, under the well-established rule of the law of agency, recognized in National Park Bank v. Concordia Land *289 & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • La Fleur v. Fontenot 93 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
  • Andrepont v. Ochsner 84 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    337 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Martin v. Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co. 81 So. 2d 852 La. 1955
    the examination •made by the defendant’s attorneys prior to the purchase of August 19, 1924, disclosed that title to an undivided half interest was of record in the name of C. E. Thibodeaux, and that the company was acquiring only an undivided interest in the property; and, 'under the well-established rule of the law of agency, recognized in National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Reymond v. Sumrall 67 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    292 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Juneau v. Laborde 54 So. 2d 325 La. 1951
    National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , *933 105 So.
  • In Re Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. 23 So. 2d 63 La. 1945
    367 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Dugas v. Powell 21 So. 2d 366 La. 1945
    case of National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Company, , 105 So.
  • Dinwiddie v. Cox 9 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
  • Harrill v. Pitts 193 So. 562 La. 1940
    “In National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., [ 105 So.
  • Tyson v. Spearman 183 So. 201 La. 1938
    230, 233 , that “notice, in its accepted legal sense, means such information on the part of the person charged with notice as would put a prudent person on inquiry to ascertain the true or actual facts," and in the case, of National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Company, , 105 So.
  • Callender v. Marks 171 So. 86 La. 1936
    For example, in National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New York 168 So. 488 La. 1936
    “In the case of National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Callender v. Marks 166 So. 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    The prescription of one year, prescribed by articles 3536 and 3537 of the Civil Code, and filed in this court, is therefore well founded.” The following pertinent holding is found in National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Taylor v. Succession of Sweetman 167 So. 431 La. 1936
    National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Urania Lumber Co. v. Powers & Critchett Lumber Co. 166 So. 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    367 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co. 165 So. 632 La. 1936
    In the case of National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Chennault v. Stovall 160 So. 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    In the case of National Park Bank v. Con-cordia Land & Timber Company, , 105 So.
  • Young v. International Paper Co. 155 So. 231 La. 1934
    654 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Diamond Paper Co. v. Penrite Creamery 142 So. 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
    That contention seems to find support in a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Company, , 105 So.
  • Rhodes v. International Paper Co. 139 So. 755 La. 1932
    654 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Spyker v. International Paper Co. 138 So. 109 La. 1931
    367 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Carroll v. Powell 136 So. 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    790 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co. (Concordia Land & Timber Co. v. Black River Lumber Co.), , 105 So.
  • Aiken v. E. Sondheimer Co. 115 So. 495 La. 1928
    C. C. art. 3537, as amended by Act 33 of 1902; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Ducros v. St. Bernard Cypress Co. 114 So. 654 La. 1927
    367 ; National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.
  • Tiller v. City of Monroe 5 La. App. 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
    (National Park Bank vs. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 105 So.