Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boylan's Detective Agency & Protection Police v. Arthur A. Brown & Co., 102 So. 417.

15 citing documents.

Richard and Gaudet v. Housing Auth., City of Lafayette 323 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
863, 864 ; Boylan's Detective Agency v. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
Econo-Car International, Inc. v. Zimmermann 201 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Boylan’s Detective A. & P. Police v. Arthur A. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
State v. Demarest 85 So. 2d 522 La. 1956
293 , and cases therein cited; Boylan’s , 102 So.
Union Truck Terminal, Inc. v. Perlstein 52 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Boylan’s Detective Agency & Protection Police v. Arthur A. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
In Re Standard Homestead Ass'n 22 So. 2d 119 La. 1945
806 ; Boylan’s Detective Agency & Protective Police v. Arthur A. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
In Re Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. 169 So. 464 La. 1936
Code, art. 3185; Boylan’s Detective A. & P. Police v. Arthur A. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co. 167 So. 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Boylan’s Detective Agency & Protection Police v. Arthur A. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
State Ex Rel. Ernest Realty Co. v. Moore, Blane & Merklein, Inc. 165 So. 147 La. 1935
See Boylan’s Detective Agency & Protection Police v. Arthur A. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
American Creosote Works, Inc. v. City of Natchitoches 162 So. 206 La. 1935
863, 864 ; Boylan’s Detective Agency v. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 161 So. 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
106, 107 , this court said: “In order to establish a lien and privilege * * * the defendant in rule must be able to invoke some pertinent and applicable codal or statutory provision creating such a lien or privilege.” And in Boylan’s Detective Agency v. Arthur A. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 160 So. 609 La. 1935
Boylan’s Detective Agency & Protection Police v. Arthur A. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
Daugherty v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 158 So. 366 La. 1934
332 , ; Cottam & Co. v. O’Shee Bros. Coffee Co., 2 La.
In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co. in Liquidation 154 So. 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Boylan’s Detective Agency & Protection Police v. Brown & Co., , 102 So.
Federal Mortgage & Finance Co. v. Bohne 146 So. 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Baldwin v. McCain 4 La. App. 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
9 , the court held: “A purchaser on credit of movable property may Validly give .it in pledge to a third person who knows that he has hot paid the price, but is otherwise in good faith, so as to vest in the pledgee a right superior to that of the vendor whose privilege thereupon ceases by reason of the property having passed out of the possession of the vendee.” In Boylans, etc., vs. Brown, etc., , 102 South.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by