Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 19 So. 2d 586.
-
Stapleton v. Travelers Ins. Co.
359 So. 2d 1051
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Based on the case of Williams v. Travelers Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, (La.App.
-
Boothe v. Universal Tank & Iron Works, Inc.
360 So. 2d 1371
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Williams v. Travelers Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn., writ of error refused, January 15, 1945.
-
Pierre v. Gulf Janitorial Serv. of Baton Rouge, Inc.
277 So. 2d 509
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Co. of Hartford, Conn., (La.App.
-
Welch v. Travelers Insurance Company
225 So. 2d 623
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
In Williams v. Travelers Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn., (1st La.App., writs refused, 1945) this court had occasion to determine whether or not a particular contract of employment was entered into in Louisiana, notwithstanding the fact that final arrangements were made in South Carolina and the employee was killed in Illinois.
-
Gardner v. Industrial Indemnity Company
212 So. 2d 452
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Co. of Hartford, Conn., La.App., ; Callihan v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity Company, La.App., .
-
Crooks v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.
175 So. 2d 875
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
1 Cir., , certiorari denied.
- Mattel v. Pittman Construction Co. 174 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
-
Babineaux v. Southeastern Drilling Corporation
170 So. 2d 518
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
1 Cir., , certiorari denied, where the substantial Louisiana contacts in confection of the employment relationship justified application of this state's compensation law to a claim resulting from an Illinois work-accident, even though technically the contract of employment was consummated and entered into in South Carolina.
- Woodham v. Travelers Insurance Company 161 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
-
Callihan v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Company
110 So. 2d 758
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Co. of Hartford, Conn., La.App., , decided by our colleagues of the First Circuit.
-
Cobb v. International Paper Company
76 So. 2d 460
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
Co. of Hartford, Conn., La.App., , disclose a situation very similar to the one now before us. The employee was in South Carolina and defendant's principal office was located in New Orleans, where negotiations commenced and finally terminated in the employment contract, consummated in a long distance telephone conversation between the employee in Sou
-
Johnson v. El Dorado Creosoting Co.
71 So. 2d 613
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
App., 1944, , but the facts of these cases are inapposite.
- Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co. 42 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
- Gardner v. Williams Brothers Corporation 28 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946