Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mitchell v. Dixie Ice Co., 102 So. 497.

13 citing documents.

Gebbia v. City of New Orleans 187 So. 2d 423 La. 1966
See also Mitchell v. Dixie Ice Co., Inc., , 102 So.
Mitchell v. First National Life Insurance 91 So. 2d 788 La. 1956
Cutrer v. Spring 4 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
art. 107; Mitchell v. Dixie Ice Co., Inc., , 102 So.
Smith v. Brock 200 So. 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
In Mitchell v. Dixie Ice Company, Inc., , 102 So.
Rogers v. Burglass 171 So. 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Tuck v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. of Dallas 164 So. 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Act No. 68 of 1902; , 102 So.
Succession of Howell 148 So. 48 La. 1933
Bywater v. Enderle 145 So. 118 La. 1932
847 , has no application to this; but an analysis thereof need not be given here, , 102 So.
Coker v. Harper 8 La. App. 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Suits for the recovery of such community assets must be prosecuted in the name of the husband, as head of the community; the wife is not competent to stand in judgment therefor, and a judgment in her favor alone in such cases will be reversed, Mitchell vs. Dixie Ice Co., , 102 So.
Paul v. Arnoult 114 So. 706 La. 1927
R. C. C. art. 2386; , 102 So.
Poncet v. South N. O. Light & Traction Co. 7 La. App. 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Mitchell vs. Dixie Co., , 102 So.
Followed Paul v. Arnoult 7 La. App. 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
.Even if we had reached a different conclusion, we are bound by the decision of the Supreme Court in the recent case of Mitchell vs. Dixie Ice Company, , 102 So.
Williams v. Perloff 1 La. App. 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
But see Mitchell vs. Dixie Ice Co., , 102 South.