No. 26919.
Precedential
Processed
State v. Simpson
State v. Simpson, 102 So. 813 (La. 1925).
Cited by
- Malatesta v. Lowry 130 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
- Blackwell v. Guiffria 187 So. 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
- May v. Schepis 147 So. 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Chutz v. Bergeron 147 So. 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- White v. Juge 142 So. 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Clark v. Greco 127 So. 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- Thiel v. Shiff 7 La. App. 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
- Klein v. Young 111 So. 495 La. 1926
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Simpson 102 So. 810
Opinion text
*621 O’NIELL, O. J. Appellant was convicted of the offense of having intoxicating liquor in his possession for beverage purposes. It was the whisky that we referred to in the case No. 26920, 102 So. 810 ,r jn which appellant was accused of manufacturing the liquor. The cases are otherwise alike and were decided on the same evidence. For the reasons given in the case No. 26920, 102 So. 810 , 1 decided today, the conviction in this case is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded for a new trial. LAND and THOMPSON, JJ., concur in decree. 1 Ante, p. 614.