No. 26953.
Precedential
Processed
State v. Peoples
State v. Peoples, 103 So. 38 (La. 1925).
Cited by
- Harrison v. Smith 814 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- HERLITZ CONST. CO., INC. v. Matherne 476 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Law v. Blackshire 367 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
- McMikle v. O'NEAL 207 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
- Driskell v. Sumlin 125 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
- Collins v. Brunet 114 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Reuther v. Bergeron 59 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
- Belaire v. Elder 49 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
- Richardson v. Charles Kirsch & Co. 189 So. 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
- Turnbull v. Goldblum 160 So. 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Dunn v. Spiro 153 So. 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- State Ex Rel. Bond v. Register of Conveyances 110 So. 559 La. 1926
Opinion text
OYERTON, J. Defendant appeals from a sentence for possessing intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. With the exception of the charge, the case is similar in all respects to the ease of State v. Peoples (No. 26952) 103 So. 38 , 1 this day decided, and hence presents nothing upon which this court may act. For the reasons there assigned, the conviction and sentence appealed from are affirmed. 1 Ante, p. 770.