No. 26975.
Precedential
Processed
State v. Poche
State v. Poche, 103 So. 341 (La. 1925).
Opinion text
O’NIELL, C. J. Appellant was prosecuted and convicted, under separate bills of information, for manufacturing intoxicating liquor and for having the liquor in his possession for beverage purposes. There is no bill of exception in the record, nor assignment of error; and, as far as we observe, there is no error. The convictions are affirmed.