Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Hillcoat, 104 So. 214.
-
Glover v. Sowada
457 So. 2d 101
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Ann. 631 ; Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Drennan & Hillcoat, , 104 So.
-
Ogden v. Ogden
331 So. 2d 592
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
631 ; Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Drennan & Hillcoat, , 104 So.
-
Bosworth v. Restivo
295 So. 2d 15
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
631 ; Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Drennan & Hillcoat, , 104 So.
-
Darden v. Cox
123 So. 2d 68
La. 1960
631 ; Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Drennan & Hillcoat, , 104 So.
-
Stovall v. Solomon
94 So. 2d 551
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
It was also held in Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Drennan & Hillcoat, -486 , 104 So.
-
Harper v. Ragus
62 So. 2d 167
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
The same rule was followed in Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Drennan & Hillcoat, 1925, , 104 So.
-
Carlson v. Ewing
54 So. 2d 414
La. 1951
744 ; Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Drennan & Hillcoat, , 104 So.
-
Ingersoll Corporation v. Rogers
46 So. 2d 45
La. 1950
744 ; Shushan Bros. & Company v. Drennan & Hillcoat et al., , 104 So.
-
Glover v. Mayer
25 So. 2d 242
La. 1946
* * ” In Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Drennan & Hillcoat et al., , 104 So.
- Reel v. Brewer 6 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
-
Hardin v. Howard
167 So. 138
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
631 , uses the following language, which is quoted with approval in Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Drennan & Hillcoat et al., , 104 So.
-
Leet v. Jones
139 So. 711
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
While the agreement to share profits did not necessarily make Leet a partner (Shushan Bros. & , 104 So.
-
Neson v. Watts
4 La. App. 615
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Counsel for defendant cites the case of Shushan Bros. and Co. vs. Drennan and Hillcoat, , 104 South.
- Shushan Bros. & Co. v. Drennan & Hillcoat 1 La. App. 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924