Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Foss, 104 So. 211.
-
State v. Brewster
764 So. 2d 969
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
P. art. 16; Id., Official Revision Comment (“Constitutional jurisdiction and powers will, of course, be unaffected by any contradictory provisions in this code.”); , 104 So.
-
State v. Neisler
633 So. 2d 1224
La. 1994
art. 16; Id., Official Revision Comment ("Constitutional jurisdiction and powers will, of course, be unaffected by any contradictory provisions in this code."); , 104 So.
-
State v. LeBlanc
517 So. 2d 219
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
“An accused party cannot waive the jurisdiction of the court and consent to be tried by an incompetent tribunal....” , 104 So.
-
State v. Nicolaus
340 So. 2d 296
La. 1976
1019 , (1966); , 104 So.
-
State v. Burnette
337 So. 2d 1096
La. 1976
1019 , (1966); , 104 So.
-
State v. Powell
325 So. 2d 791
La. 1976
1019 , (1966); , 104 So.
-
State v. Lawrence
294 So. 2d 476
La. 1974
1019 , (1966); , 104 So.
- State v. Marcell 183 So. 2d 341 La. 1966
-
State v. Laborde
97 So. 2d 393
La. 1957
Section 214, page 917; , 104 So.
- State v. Goins 94 So. 2d 244 La. 1957
- State v. Sears 55 So. 2d 881 La. 1951
- State v. Sears 55 So. 2d 881 La. 1951
- State v. Hart 164 So. 166 La. 1935
-
State v. Brownfield
106 So. 734
La. 1925
471, , where the issue was whether the accused, after requesting that the proceedings in his case be continued during the early hours of a Sunday morning, could take advantage, by motion in arrest of judgment, of the fact that they had been so continued, it was held that he could not.