Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Holder, 105 So. 232.
- State v. Nixon 308 So. 2d 788 La. 1975
- State v. Jones 288 So. 2d 48 La. 1973
- State v. Gilbert 286 So. 2d 345 La. 1973
- State v. Latigue 203 So. 2d 546 La. 1967
- State v. Fruge 204 So. 2d 287 La. 1967
-
State v. Martin
200 So. 2d 871
La. 1967
602 , 23 So.2d *997 230 ; , 105 So.
- City of Monroe v. Barfield 164 So. 2d 340 La. 1964
- State v. Cade 153 So. 2d 382 La. 1963
- State v. Copling 135 So. 2d 271 La. 1961
-
State v. Kelly
131 So. 2d 43
La. 1961
State v. Holder, 1925, , 105 So.
- State v. White 131 So. 2d 44 La. 1961
-
State v. Garner
128 So. 2d 655
La. 1961
ch is based upon no evidence at all “presents the question of law of whether it be lawful to convict an accused without any proof whatsoever as to his guilt”, it is firmly established and the Courts must likewise adhere to the proposition that “It is only when there is no evidence at all upon some essential element of the crime charged that (the Court) may set aside a verdict * * , 105 So.
-
State v. Cortez
30 So. 2d 681
La. 1947
“It is only where there is no evidence at all on some essential element of crime charged that (the court) may set aside a verdict * * , 105 So.
-
State v. McDonell
23 So. 2d 230
La. 1945
"It is only where there is no evidence at all upon some essential element of crime charged that [the court] may set aside a verdict * * , 105 So.
- State v. O'Day 175 So. 838 La. 1937