Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gibbens v. New Orleans Terminal Co., 105 So. 367.
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Texas 209 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Guidroz v. Travelers Insurance Co. 99 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
- Albrecht v. Gaethe 97 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1957
- Matthews v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 45 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
- Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co. 40 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
-
Martin v. Yazoo M. R. Co.
181 So. 571
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
671 ; Gibbens *580 v. New Orleans Terminal Co., , 105 So.
- Friede v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 156 So. 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
-
Favaza v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
154 So. 457
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
In affirming this holding of the Cburt of Appeal, the Supreme Court said: “He did not look, and -he did not listen, at a time when the proper exercise of the two senses would have been effective, and would have avoided the injury to himself and to his automobile.” , 105 So.
-
Burthe v. Lee
152 So. 100
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
App. 371 , this court, according to a syllabus written by the court, held that: “The presumption of law, juris et de jure, is that a plaintiff saw a thing that he should have seen had he looked, and that he failed to look at the proper time and in the proper manner if he did not see the things he should have seen by looking.” The Supreme Court ( , 105 So.
-
Holderith v. Zilbermann
151 So. 670
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
The drivers of both cars to his left saw the truck, coming, and the driver of a third car, which was behind his ear, also saw the truck, and we are of the opinion that the action of plaintiff’s son was plainly negligent.” , 105 So.
- Pugh v. Henritzy 151 So. 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Pearce v. Missouri Pac. R. Co. 143 So. 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Young v. City of New Orleans 129 So. 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
-
Dardenne v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
127 So. 458
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
353 , ; Perrin vs. New Orleans Terminal Co., 140 La.
-
Pritchard v. Yazoo & Miss. Valley R. R.
127 So. 397
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
App. 371 , affirmed by Supreme Court, , 105 So.
-
McLellan v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad
127 So. 648
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
We do not consider the cases of Gibbens vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 105 So.
- Lanphier v. D'Antoni 131 So. 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
-
Lipscomb v. Standard Highway Co.
124 So. 156
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
250 ; Gibbens vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 105 So.
-
Newsom v. I. C. R. R.
122 So. 874
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
865 ; Gibbens vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 105 So.
-
Lehon v. N. O. Pub. Service, Inc.
123 So. 172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Gibbons vs. New Orleans Terminal Co., , 105 So.
-
Smith v. Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co.
120 So. 669
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
602 ; Gibbens vs. N. O. Terminal Company, , 105 So.
-
Hirsch v. L. R. & N. Co.
120 So. 410
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
In answer to the second charge, we quote from Gibbens vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 105 So.
-
Webb v. V. S. & P. Ry. Co.
119 So. 720
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
“Gibbens vs. New Orleans Terminal Co., , 105 So.
- City of Shreveport v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co. 118 So. 872 La. 1928
-
Pylant v. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
8 La. App. 350
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1928
App. 371 ; also, same case, , 105 South.
-
Blake v. Jefferson-St. Charles Transfer Co.
8 La. App. 310
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
App. 730 ; Gibbons vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 105 So.
-
Walker v. L. R. & N. Co.
6 La. App. 479
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Gibbins vs. N. O. Terminal Co., and 348, 105 South.
-
Toups v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co.
4 La. App. 136
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
e of this State is uniform to the effect that a pedestrian or a driver of a vehicle upon approaching railway tracks and public railway crossings must, at his peril; stop, look and listen before proceeding on the track or to make the crossing, and if he does not do so he is guilty of contributing to any injury which he may suffer, and cannot recover therefor.” Gibbons vs. New Orleans Terminal Co., , 105 South.