Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bourgeois, 104 So. 627.

13 citing documents.

State v. Freeman 447 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Gilmore 332 So. 2d 789 La. 1976
State v. Edwards 287 So. 2d 518 La. 1973
State v. Ford 254 So. 2d 457 La. 1971
State v. Hughes 154 So. 2d 395 La. 1963
State v. Hoover 13 So. 2d 784 La. 1943
“The rule is that, where there is a conflict between the statement of defendant’s counsel and that of the trial judge, the latter’s statement of facts will be accepted in the absence of proof that the judge was in, error.” , 104 So.
State v. Mistich 171 So. 841 La. 1937
to him, ‘You have nothing to say’ or ‘You don’t say anything.’ I then sentenced Steve Mistich to serve not less than one year and not more than three years.” “The rule is that, where there is a conflict between the statement of defendant’s counsel and that of the trial judge, the latter’s statement of facts will be accepted in the absence of proof that the judge was in error.” , 104 So.
State v. Doucet 147 So. 500 La. 1933
State v. Kelly 146 So. 6 La. 1933
State v. Washington 144 So. 437 La. 1932
State v. Washington 144 So. 437 La. 1932
Though this is the case, the ruling of a Judge of first instance on a question of this character should not be disturbed, unless clearly erroneous.” , 104 So.
State v. Terrell 144 So. 488 La. 1932
State v. Curry 140 So. 480 La. 1932