Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Curtis, 109 So. 832.

13 citing documents.

Succession of Fuselier 325 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Succession of Leduc 153 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
King v. BOARD OF COM'RS FOR ATCHAFALAYA BASIN L. DIST. 148 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
As an essential element of its reasoning, not obiter dicta, the Supreme Court held that the constitutional prohibition did not even partially repeal the pre-1921 grant to the levee board of the right to apply for their such lands because, : "The state, should it transfer the land to the district, including the mineral rights, in accordance with the grant made by it would not be parting with the property within the meaning of the constitutional section cited [i. e., the constitutional prohibition
Succession of Israel 146 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Stokes v. Harrison 115 So. 2d 373 La. 1959
Succession of Rockwood 91 So. 2d 779 La. 1956
Succession of Gaines 79 So. 2d 322 La. 1955
Patin v. T. L. James Co. 42 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Cameron v. Rowland 23 So. 2d 283 La. 1945
Cameron v. Rowland. 23 So. 2d 285 La. 1945
In Re Gray's Succession 9 So. 2d 481 La. 1942
633, 640 , the Court, in its opinion on rehearing, quoted with approval from the , 109 So.
Chapman-Storm Lumber Co. v. Board of Com'rs for Atchafalaya Basin Levee Dist. 200 So. 455 La. 1941
1039 , ], the court held that the state registrar and ‘auditor, against whom mandamus proceedings were instituted by the Board of Commissioners of the Tensas Levee District to compel the transfer of state lands to the board in confirmation of the grant of these lands by the act creating the board, could not plead the prescri
Succession of Kneipp 134 So. 376 La. 1931