Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roussel v. Railways Realty Co., 115 So. 742.
- Jarrell v. Jarrell 811 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- Munson v. Martin 192 So. 2d 126 La. 1966
- Loew's, Incorporated v. Don George, Inc. 110 So. 2d 553 La. 1959
- Juneau v. Laborde 82 So. 2d 693 La. 1955
- In Re Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. 23 So. 2d 63 La. 1945
- Canepa v. Jackson 18 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
- Peters v. Crawford 199 So. 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
- Bandel v. Sabine Lumber Co. 193 So. 359 La. 1939
- Handelman's Chain Stores v. Maryland Casualty Co. 184 So. 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
- Gregory v. Kedley 185 So. 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
- Adkins v. Cason 170 So. 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
- Ruth v. Buwe 168 So. 776 La. 1936
- Ruth v. Buwe 168 So. 776 La. 1936
-
Succession of Waterman, Sr.
165 So. 182
La. 1935
The thing demanded must be the same; the demand must be founded on the same cause of action; the demand must be between the same parties, and formed by them against each other in the same quality.” See, also, , 115 So.
- Ethridge-Atkins Corporation v. Abraham 160 So. 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Crowe v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. 154 So. 52 La. 1934
- Fried v. New York Life Ins. Co. 148 So. 5 La. 1933
- Eddins v. Giles 142 So. 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Price v. Town of Ruston 139 So. 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- McDonald v. City of Shreveport 137 So. 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
- Nelson v. York 132 So. 652 La. 1931
- Succession of Savant 132 So. 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
-
Huff v. Fitzsimmons
130 So. 142
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
545 , ; Gallagher v. Louque et al., 169 La.
-
Lee v. Frierson
127 So. 114
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
We do hot think that the prescription under that article is applicable to the claim for the value of the use of the prop-' erty, as such claim is based upon the principle that one may not enrich himself at tlie ‘ expense of another, and the obligation , is to pay for the use of the property and is not prescribed under ten years (Civil Code, art. 3544; Roussel vs. Railways Realty Co., , 115 So.