DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite M. Feitel House Wrecking Co. v. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co., 106 So. 292.

13 citing documents.

  • TOP CROP SEED & SUP. CO. v. Bank of Southwest La. 457 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Smith v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Company 272 So. 2d 678 La. 1973
    The principles which deny Smith the right to assert a claim on this check against Louisiana Bank and Trust Company, which cashed the check with his forged endorsement, or against Capital Bank and Trust Company, the drawee bank, , 106 So.
  • Smith v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Company 255 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
  • First National Bank of West Monroe v. Campbell 242 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    M. Feitel House Wrecking Company v. Citizens’ Bank & Trust Company, , 106 So.
  • Succession of Schneider 199 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    M. Feitel House Wrecking Company v. Citizens’ Bank & Trust Company of Louisiana, , 106 So.
  • Fernon v. Capital Bank & Trust Company 190 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Defendant's exception of no cause of action is based on the premise that the payee of a check cashed through the means of a forged endorsement has no cause of action against either the collecting bank or the drawee bank, citing M. Feitel House Wrecking Co. v. Citizens' Bank and Trust Company, et al. (1925) , 106 So.
  • Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Bank of Louisiana in New Orleans 167 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    M. Feitel House Wrecking Co. v. Citizens’ Bank & Trust Co., , 106 So.
  • Peoples Cotton Oil Co. v. Hunt Foods & Industries, Inc. 147 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Appellant cites M. Feitel House Wrecking Co. v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co., , 106 So.
  • Blanchard v. Bank of Morgan City & Trust Co. 185 So. 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    Negotiable Instrument Law, Act No. 64 of 1904, § 189; Feitel House Wrecking Company, Inc. v. Citizens’ Bank & Trust Company et al., , 106 So.
  • Lawrence J. Kern, Inc. v. Panos 177 So. 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    463 ; M. Feitel House Wrecking Company v. Citizens’ Bank et al., , 106 So.
  • Strudwick Funeral Home, Inc. v. Liberty Industrial Life Ins. 176 So. 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    The Supreme Court, in Feitel House Wrecking Co. v. Citizens’ Bank & Trust Co., , 106 So.
  • Spremich v. Somerfield 166 So. 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    Instrument Law of Louisiana, Act No. 64 of 1904, and particularly by section 189 thereof, which reads as follows: “A check of itself does not operate as an -assignment of any part of the funds to the credit of the drawer with the bank, and the bank is not liable to the holder, unless and until it accepts or certifies the check.” In Feitel House Wrecking Co. v. Citizens’ Bank & Trust Company, , 106 So.
  • Joffrion-Woods, Inc. v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. 139 So. 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
    755 , , said: “ * * * the law in this state is that, until a cheek has been accepted or certified by the drawee bank, it does not operate as an assignment of any part of the funds of the drawer in the bank, although the bank may have been notified of the drawing of the check, and hence, unless the check has been accept