Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Paul Klopstock & Co. v. United Fruit Co., 131 So. 25.

18 citing documents.

Andrew Kidder v. Statewide Transport, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
―It is well established that, when Congress acts under this power, its legislation primes and supersedes state legislation.‖ Paul Klopstock &
Brown & Blackwood v. Ricou-Brewster Building Co. 121 So. 2d 70 La. 1960
463 , ; Klopstock & , 131 So.
Neuss, Hesslein & Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R. 59 So. 2d 195 La. 1952
The Klopstock case presented the same factual situation, , 131 So.
Lopez v. Lopez 23 So. 2d 104 La. 1945
Paul Klopstock & Co., , 131 So.
Succession of Singer 23 So. 2d 184 La. 1945
527, 530 , this court said: “Article 906 of the Code of Practice permits this court to remand causes when it does not believe matters are in such a condition as to enable it properly to pronounce judgment therein.” , 131 So.
Vilce v. Traveler Ins. Co. 18 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Stafford's Estate v. Progressive Nat. Farm Loan Ass'n 3 So. 2d 532 La. 1941
In the case of Klopstock & , 131 So.
Alexander v. Jackson 197 So. 137 La. 1940
In support of the application, the appellant relies on Article 906 of the Code of Practice; Klopstock & , 131 So.
Cook v. Crow 194 So. 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
' Many persons observe their moral obligations as faithfully, as they do their legally enforceable ones, and the books are full of cases where enforceable judgments have been rendered where prescription might have been successfully pleaded as a bar to recovery.’ “ , 131 So.
Sterkx v. Sterkx 190 So. 628 La. 1939
527 ; Klopstock & Co., Inc., v. United Fruit Co., , 131 So.
Fogleman v. Interurban Transp. Co. 187 So. 73 La. 1939
Paul Klopstock & , 131 So.
Walker v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co. of Nashville 184 So. 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
527 ; Klopstock & , 131 So.
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Co. 178 So. 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
497 ; Paul Klopstock & , 131 So.
State Ex Rel. Salomon v. City of New Orleans 174 So. 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
the city to act resulted — so counsel maintain — from the city’s own neglect and they cite several cases in which it was held that the doctrine could not be applied; for instance, Klopstock & , 131 So.
Wicker v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 172 So. 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
art. 906; Klopstock Co., Inc., v. United Fruit Co., , 131 So.
Demasi v. Whitney Trust & Savings Bank 163 So. 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
In Klopstock & Co., Inc., v. United Fruit Co., , 131 So.
State v. Strother 154 So. 22 La. 1934
485 ; Klopstock & , 131 So.
Paul Klopstock & Co. v. United Fruit Co. 149 So. 462 La. 1933
* * * “As to whether the affidavit shows that the flour was transported by the carriers under a common control management or arrangement, as provided by section 1 of the Interstate Commerce Act, we think that the copies of the railway bills and receipts attached to the affidavits sufficiently suggest a com *813 mon arrangement to justify us in remanding the ease.” , 131 So.